What kind of experiment was the Piliavin et al study?
What kind of experiment was the Piliavin et al study?
field experiment
Piliavin et al. designed a field experiment, using covert observation to test several variables and their effect on helping behaviour. These included the responsibility of the victim (drunk/cane,) race of the victim, effect of modelling and effect of group size.
What is the Piliavin experiment?
This study was designed to investigate how a group of people would react if they saw a person who collapsed on a train. Specifically, they wanted to investigate: Would an ill person get more help than a drunk person? (the type of victim)?
What was the aim of Piliavin study?
The aim of this study was to investigate whether train passengers were more likely to help someone who appeared to be ill, rather than one who appeared to be drunk.
What is the psychology that is being investigated in Piliavin?
The main focus of the research was to investigate the effect of the type of victim (drunk or ill) and the ethnicity of victim (black or white) on the speed and frequency of the response and the ethnicity of the responder.
What is Canli et al?
STUDY. Aim. – To find out if the Amygdala is sensitive to varying degrees of emotional intensity from external stimuli. – To find out wether emotional intensity enhances memory for the stimuli.
Why is Piliavin ethnocentric?
– = Sample was drawn from the New York area, so ethnocentric, so results cannot be generalised to individuals from other areas/countries whose helping behaviour may be different.
What is the aim of Canli et al?
There were two aims of the study, coming from the background mentioned above: to test whether the amygdala is sensitive to varying degrees of individually experienced emotional intensity. to test whether the degree of emotional intensity affects the role of the amygdala in enhancing memory for emotional stimuli.
What research method was used in Canli et al?
Building on the relation between E and N and emotional reactivity, Canli and colleagues (Canli et al., 2001) used fMRI to inves- tigate whether variation in these personality traits would correlate with individual differences in brain reactivity to positive and negative emotional stimuli, respectively.
What is bystander apathy?
Bystander apathy is the tendency of bystanders in some stressful or life-threatening situations to not react or intervene to help others.
What is the Canli et al?
What causes bystander apathy?
Three psychological factors are thought to facilitate bystander apathy: the feeling of having less responsibility when more bystanders are present (diffusion of responsibility), the fear of unfavorable public judgment when helping (evaluation apprehension), and the belief that because no one else is helping, the …
What was Piliavin’s alternative to the decision model?
Piliavin et al. (1969) put forward the cost–reward arousal model as a major alternative to the decision model and state it represents a ‘fine tuning’ of the earlier model. In a similar fashion to Latané and Darley’s decision helping model, it has two stages that occur before we either help or don’t help.
What did Piliavin and Darley say about arousal?
Piliavin et al. (1969) put forward the cost–reward arousal model as a major alternative to the decision model and state it represents a ‘fine tuning’ of the earlier model. In a similar fashion to Latané and Darley’s decision helping model, it has two stages that occur before we either help or don’t help. The first stage is physiological arousal.
Are there any ethical issues with the Piliavin study?
Ethical Considerations: There a number of ethical issues associated with Piliavin et al.’s study. Participants were unaware that they were taking part in an experiment, therefore they could not consent to take part and it was also not possible to withdraw from the study or be debriefed.
What was the main focus of Piliavin and al.1969?
Piliavin et al. (1969) The main focus of the research was to investigate the effect of the type of victim (drunk or ill) and the ethnicity of victim (black or white) on the speed and frequency of the response and the ethnicity of the responder.